The Chancellor’s budget statement March 2016

The Chancellor’s budget statement did not give us the devolution prize we want for Yorkshire, but I am hoping that the signs are still encouraging for us to reach the right deal.

On the plus side, the confirmation of better rail and road links is welcome – however, as always, we now need to see the detail to ensure that Kirklees benefits from this investment. And improvements to the M62 will hopefully reduce the congestion and the loss to the economy of time spent in heavy traffic on the motorway.

But on the negative side, it is disappointing that George Osborne made no mention of the progress we have made so far on a devolution deal for the Leeds City Region. I believe this is the only viable footprint that will allow us to make the economic achievements we all want to see. We know there is widespread support for our proposal from local business leaders, and while the current situation is frustrating, we will continue to work to secure the right deal for the region.

That means a deal that builds on what we have already achieved – an increase in economic growth and a focus on skills to meet the needs of existing and future businesses.

I believe there is still time to agree a deal within the 2017 timescale that other northern regions are working towards, especially as there is the determination of everyone involved to make sure that we get the balance right between speed and getting the right deal to give us the best chance of making economic progress.

West Yorkshire council leaders are aiming for an urgent meeting with government to make sure we reach a deal as quickly as possible – any further delays will be to the detriment of jobs, growth and business investment in our region.

 Personally I have always been in favour of an approach to devolution that would be consistent across the country. I think this would have been more open. But as the government has chosen this ‘deal making approach’ we have to work with it.

One thought on “The Chancellor’s budget statement March 2016

  1. RE: Dylan/#8–that’s how I got in as well, but when I tried to “invite” a handful of people that way, none of them were able to sign up. I think that those links don’t work any better/worse than a normal invite, or just going to the Google + home page, unless Google is currently allowing new accounts to be created.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s